Managing Diversity.1) why you have selected this topic, why it is Essay

Managing Diversity.1) why you have selected this topic, why it is important to you,why it is important for the companies to value,how this area will change over the next five years - Essay Example . Also, managing diversity should be part of an organizational culture because it would attract customers. Customers have a preference to buy services and groups from diverse businesses. Therefore, companies with a diverseness within their management will simply fulfil the needs of a wide customer base. Lastly, cultural intelligence is the most compelling significance of having a diverse workforce. As a result, when clients and employees are diverse, opportunities to not only learn but also acknowledge the values held sacred by others are boundless (Barzantny, 2007). Times are changing in the labour force, and stakeholders are changing in various ways, apart from gender and race, people with disabilities, single parent families, ageing workforce and dual-earner families. For this reason, there is a need for the creation of diverse policies, behaviours and work culture where people feel like an essential part of the organization. Management diversity will bring competitiveness in organizations thus enhancing performance innovations in the business world. In the advent of increased diversification of the business world, a number of corporations are investing in different parts of the world. Hence interacting with people from different cultural backgrounds. This will prompt the need to utilise it. Thus, it will gain more popularity among major business. Most managers will have to integrate it as part of their management techniques for increased performance in the

Karl Marx - Capital Ch 24 Sec 1 Ch 25 Sections 1-4 Essay

Karl Marx - Capital Ch 24 Sec 1 Ch 25 Sections 1-4 - Essay Example The worker is purely the actor through whom the means of production acquire value. In Chapter 25 of Capital, Marx states that, â€Å"The mass of the means of production which (the worker) thus transforms, increases with the productiveness of his labor† (Marx, 682). The â€Å"mass† in question – to use Marx’s own example, the raw material labor transforms into yarn – represents a fundamentally industrial process that is ossified, a carefully preserved scenario to which Marx failed to ascribe the eventuality of progressive change. Darwinian theorist though he was, Marx appears to have reckoned without the process of evolution, which is surely as pervasive and dynamic in the field of economics as it is in the anthropological study of man’s development. Industrial revolution has given way to industrial evolution, yielding a far more complex and sophisticated labor paradigm than could possibly be accounted for in Marx’s Name 2 equation. Mar x does address the â€Å"division of labor in manufacture,† proposing that â€Å"with the use of machinery, more raw material is worked up in the same time, and, therefore, a greater mass of raw material and auxiliary substances enter in the labour-process† (682).